The Truth About XRP & Blackrock’s Suddenly Found Love For Crypto

July 13, 2023, will be remembered as a watershed moment in the annals of cryptocurrency history. On this day, XRP, the digital asset associated with Ripple, was officially declared not a security for secondary sales. This landmark ruling paves the way for crypto exchanges across the United States to relist XRP, signaling a significant shift in the regulatory landscape.

In the wake of this groundbreaking announcement, Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, made a bold proclamation. He stated that “crypto will transcend international currencies due to global demand.” This statement, made on CNBC, indicates a seismic shift in the perception of cryptocurrencies by traditional financial institutions.

Fink further elaborated that over the past five years, there has been a surge in inquiries about the role of crypto from gold investors. This interest is primarily driven by Bitcoin’s reputation as a hedge against inflation and its moniker as ‘digital gold.’ With Bitcoin’s supply capped at 21 million, it presents a tangible asset that appeals to a broad spectrum of investors, from individual enthusiasts to major banks.

However, Fink’s statement also carried a note of caution. He emphasized that BlackRock is committed to ensuring that any new markets it enters are “safe, sound, and protected.” This commitment is particularly significant in light of the recent news about BlackRock’s Bitcoin Spot ETF, which was recognized by the SEC. While the application has not been approved yet, it is widely expected to pass soon.

The entry of institutional money into the crypto market is a double-edged sword, with both potential benefits and drawbacks.

On the upside, institutional investors bring substantial capital, enhancing liquidity and expanding investment opportunities. Their involvement also lends credibility to the crypto market, traditionally seen as speculative. Furthermore, these investors can bolster the crypto market’s infrastructure by investing in novel technologies and services. Lastly, their participation could lead to clearer regulatory oversight, reducing fraud and increasing investor protection.

However, there are concerns. Critics argue that institutional involvement could lead to market manipulation and a loss of cryptocurrencies’ decentralized essence. Increased regulation and compliance costs could stifle innovation and growth. The crypto market’s volatility might also be a deterrent for institutional investors unprepared for the associated risks. Lastly, institutional involvement could lead to greater centralization, potentially undermining the decentralized ethos of cryptocurrencies.

In conclusion, the impact of institutional money on the crypto market is a complex issue with potential pros and cons. The long-term effects remain to be seen.

The true intended purpose of Bitcoin is self-custody. If you buy through an asset manager or third party like BlackRock, they’re holding onto it for you, and essentially, it’s not your coins. Therefore, while diversifying one’s portfolio with these institutions can improve one’s quality of life, it’s crucial to remember the importance of self-custody.

In conclusion, while the recent developments in the crypto market are cause for celebration, especially for the XRP community, it’s essential for investors to stay alert and informed. As the old adage goes, “if you’re not a custodian of your coins, you’re going to be missing out.”